@kdfrawg no I meant actual journalists like those NYT and WaPo folks who post links frequently and are verified.
@kdfrawg professional journos already post a lot of content to twitter for free. They link to their own sites and to articles from other sites (all newspapers). All twitter needs to do is throw all those into a feed and charge a fee (shared with the newspapers) for the same. It's better than what Facebook has done!
Just thought to myself that twitter could easily have made money by creating lists/feeds of reporters and newspapers and then charging a small subscription fees from users who want targeted, smart, and timely content instead of constantly pushing the lists feature away. This would have brought newspapers to the new age faster than the stumbling ways they adopt now and would have been an instant win for twttr but they chose to destroy value instead of create it. Oh well.
A cummerbund is a kind of sash and not a kind of belt… so I've learnt thanks to the NYT crossword…
In the new Kindle Oasis, would it be possible to listen to reading music while reading text? Bluetooth headphones and all…